Bejin Bieneman PLC | Intellectual Property Attorneys

A national intellectual property law firm committed to maximizing client satisfaction by understanding client business objectives to deliver long term returns on investments.

About the Firm

Recent Firm News

Charles Bieneman to Present at Strafford Live CLE Webinar: Overcoming §101 Rejections for Computer and Electronics Related Patents

Southfield, MI (March 27, 2018) – On Thursday, April 19 at 1pm EDT, Bejin Bieneman PLC partner Charles Bieneman, along with Michael P. She… Read More

Daniel Hegner to Present on Functional Claiming

Updated: March 27, 2018 Daniel Hegner’s presentation on Functional Claiming: Pitfalls and How To’s has been expanded to the Indiana… Read More

Peter Keros Elected President of Hellenic Bar Association of Michigan

Southfield, MI (March 20, 2018) – Peter Keros of Bejin Bieneman was recently elected President of the Hellenic Bar Association of Michigan… Read More

Upcoming Webinars

The Supreme Court on Inter Partes Review - CLE Pending

July 19, 2018 at 12:00 pm EDT

The Supreme Court recently issued decisions in Oil States v. Greene’s Energyand SAS Institute v. Iancuaffecting inter partes review before the Patent and Trademark Office. During the July webinar, Bryan Hart of Bejin Bieneman w… Register

Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Restriction Practice - CLE Pending

August 16, 2018 at 12:00 pm EDT

Read More On Webinars >>

B2 IP Report

Non-Patented Features and the Entire Market Value Rule

July 16th, 2018

Evidence that a patented feature drives customer demand is insufficient to justify damages under the entire market value rule (EMVR) when non-patented features may drive customer demand. Power Integrations, No. 2017-1875 (Fed. Cir. July 3, 2018). The…

Does Presumption of Patent Validity Extend to Eligibility?

July 10th, 2018

A plaintiff seeking to enforce patents claiming automated methods for uploading multimedia content was ordered to pay defendants’ attorney fees based on a finding of an “exceptional case” under U.S.C. § 285. Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, In…

Arguments in Patent Appeal Reply Brief Wrongly Ignored

June 21st, 2018

The Federal Circuit has clarified what arguments may be made in a reply brief during a patent appeal. In In Re: Durance, No. 2017-1486 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 1, 2018), the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB’s obviousness decision and remanded the case back…

Visit The B2 IP Report »