Bejin Bieneman PLC | Intellectual Property Attorneys

A national intellectual property law firm committed to maximizing client satisfaction by understanding client business objectives to deliver long term returns on investments.

About the Firm

Recent Firm News

Bejin Bieneman PLC Participates in Street Law Diversity Pipeline Program

Southfield, MI – Eighteen students from Southfield High School for Arts and Technology had the opportunity to participate in a workshop fe… Read More

Bejin Bieneman PLC Joins Ford Motor Company’s Legal Alliance for Women in a Global Day of Service

Worldwide Effort Brings Together Volunteers from the Legal Profession to Support More Than 80 Community-Based Organizations Ford Motor Compa… Read More

Bejin Bieneman PLC Announces Addition of IP Attorney Tyson Benson

Bejin Bieneman PLC, (http://www.b2iplaw.com), an intellectual property boutique law firm, is pleased to announce that Of Counsel attorney Ty… Read More

Webinars

Patent Law 2020: Understanding the Critical Issues and Best Practices in an Ever-Changing Patent Law Environment

February 20, 2020

REGISTER NOW

The past several years have brought myriad changes to patent law – including new legislation, new USPTO guidance and procedures, and increased Supreme Court activity.

In this 60-minute webinar, Tyson Benson will discuss the critical issues and the best practices in light of these changes to patent law.

Topics include:

Discuss best practices for preparing and prosecuting patent applications in light of the USPTO’s updated guidance and procedures.
What is the future of the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) following the Federal Circuit decision deeming PTAB judges were unconstitutionally appointed?
Discuss recent Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions.

Past Webinars >>

B2 IP Report

Emergency Alert System Is Not Patent-Eligible: Tenaha Licensing LLC v. TigerConnect, Inc.

January 13th, 2020

Patent claims directed to “alert and notification” are ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and the two-part Mayo/Alice patent-eligibility test, said a Delaware magistrate judge, recommending granting a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a lawsuit…

Claims Combing a System and a Method for Using the System are Invalid for Indefiniteness Under § 112

January 6th, 2020

During a Markman patent claim construction proceeding, the Western District of Texas ruled multiple claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,284,203 invalid for indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112 because the claims “improperly combine system and method claim…

No Attorney Fees for § 101 Dismissal: Data Scape Ltd. v. Spotify USA Inc.

December 16th, 2019

Despite a refiled case and a subsequent dismissal for ineligible subject matter, plaintiff Data Scape escaped paying attorney fees to defendant Spotify in a recent decision from the Central District of California. Data Scape Limited v. Spotify USA…

Visit The B2 IP Report »