Bejin Bieneman PLC | Intellectual Property Attorneys

A national intellectual property law firm committed to maximizing client satisfaction by understanding client business objectives to deliver long term returns on investments.

About the Firm

Recent Firm News

Bejin Bieneman presents an introduction to IP law at Oakland University Society of Women Engineers and The National Society of Black Engineers

Bejin Bieneman PLC will present an IP law informational event with Oakland University Society of Women Engineers and The National Society of… Read More

Bejin Bieneman PLC Participates in Street Law Diversity Pipeline Program

Southfield, MI – Eighteen students from Southfield High School for Arts and Technology had the opportunity to participate in a workshop fe… Read More

Bejin Bieneman PLC Joins Ford Motor Company’s Legal Alliance for Women in a Global Day of Service

Worldwide Effort Brings Together Volunteers from the Legal Profession to Support More Than 80 Community-Based Organizations Ford Motor Compa… Read More

Webinars

Patent Law 2020: Understanding the Critical Issues and Best Practices in an Ever-Changing Patent Law Environment

February 20, 2020

REGISTER NOW

The past several years have brought myriad changes to patent law – including new legislation, new USPTO guidance and procedures, and increased Supreme Court activity.

In this 60-minute webinar, Tyson Benson will discuss the critical issues and the best practices in light of these changes to patent law.

Topics include:

Discuss best practices for preparing and prosecuting patent applications in light of the USPTO’s updated guidance and procedures.
What is the future of the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) following the Federal Circuit decision deeming PTAB judges were unconstitutionally appointed?
Discuss recent Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions.

Past Webinars >>

B2 IP Report

§ 101 Patent-Eligibility Turns on a Technical Solution to a Technical Problem: Pebble Tide LLC v. Arlo Technologies

February 10th, 2020

In an interesting dichotomy, patent claims directed to outputting digital content did not survive, but claims directed to social network search output did survive, respective motions to dismiss based on lack of patent-eligible subject matter under 35…

Claim Term “Important” Leads to Indefiniteness

February 6th, 2020

The Eastern District of Texas recently invalidated several patent claims that the court had found indefinite in a separate claim construction ruling in the case Uniloc 2017 v. Samsung. Interestingly, the court found the claim term “partition of imp…

CAFC Affirms Use of “General Knowledge” in Obviousness Analysis

February 4th, 2020

The Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the PTAB finding that the claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,529,806 are “obvious over [the prior art] in light of the general knowledge of a skilled artisan.” Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Google LLC, et al., No…

Visit The B2 IP Report »