Bejin Bieneman PLC | Intellectual Property Attorneys

A national intellectual property law firm committed to maximizing client satisfaction by understanding client business objectives to deliver long term returns on investments.

About the Firm

Recent Firm News

Bejin Bieneman PLC Announces Addition of IP Attorney Tyson Benson

Bejin Bieneman PLC, (http://www.b2iplaw.com), an intellectual property boutique law firm, is pleased to announce that Of Counsel attorney Ty… Read More

Bejin Bieneman PLC Announces Diversity Scholarship Program

Bejin Bieneman, PLC, announces its 2019 Scholarships for Diversity in Patent Law, to encourage those in traditionally underrepresented group… Read More

Charles Bieneman and Daniel Hegner to Present on Recent Developments in U.S. Patent Law in Toronto, Canada

Southfield, MI (February 5, 2019) – Bejin Bieneman partners, Charles Bieneman and Daniel Hegner, will present on recent developments in U.… Read More

2019 IP Seminar

7th Annual
Intellectual Property Seminar

September 18, 2019
Detroit Athletic Club

Best Practices For Patent Portfolio Creation, Management and Use

On September 18, 2019, Bejin Bieneman PLC will host its 7th annual IP Seminar at the Detroit Athletic Club. The seminar will take place from 3pm - 5pm and will be followed by a networking event from 5pm - 7pm.

Topics will include patent drafting, patent prosecution, cost containment, and licensing.

Panelists include

E. Joe Benz
Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, Ford Motor Company

John Cheek
Chief Patent Counsel, DRiV

Charles Bieneman
Global Asset Management, Bejin Bieneman PLC

B2 IP Report

Indefiniteness Challenges Hinge On Textual Support

September 17th, 2019

Whether a court holds a patent claim indefinite under 35 U.S.C § 112 can depend on textual support in the body of the claim or in the patent specification. In Luminati Networks, Ltd. v. UAB Tesonet, no. 2:18-cv-299 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2019), the Cou…

Death and Taxes and Patent-Ineligibility of Business Methods

September 12th, 2019

For all the kvetching about the frustrating subjectivity and unpredictability of applying the Mayo/Alice patent-eligibility test, here is a case showing that there is a zone of certainty in determining patentability under 35 U.S.C. § 101. In In re G…

Generic Computer Collecting Data and Using Mathematical Formula is Ineligible

September 10th, 2019

A court held that patent claims directed toward “data collection and mathematical computations are quintessential abstract ideas,” and “[t]he generic equipment underlying the claims does not provide an inventive concept,” granting a motion to…

Visit The B2 IP Report »